Death of creativity: AI-generated image wins a fine arts competition

Sep 1, 2022

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Death of creativity: AI-generated image wins a fine arts competition

Sep 1, 2022

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

AI text-to-image (even text-to-video) platforms have been a thing for a while now. We’ve seen plenty of creative stuff generated through Midjourney or DALL-E… But what happens when one of them wins a fine arts contest?

Jason Allen recently went viral after winning the first prize in Colorado State Fair’s contest with an AI-generated image. As you can probably imagine, this has made artists shocked and furious. How could he win?! He only typed a short prompt, pressed Enter, and in a minute or so got a picture that won first place. But is it really what the process looked like?

Allen’s Théâtre D’opéra Spatial won the Digital Arts/Digitally-Manipulated Photography category of the contest. He used Midjourney to create it, and as you probably know, it doesn’t require any particular artistic skill on a person’s side. You don’t need to be a photographer, an illustrator, a digital artist… Basically, you only need to know how to type.

After sharing the news, Allen became viral for all the wrong reasons. The amount of hate he received was overwhelming. “Someone entered an art competition with an AI-generated piece and won the first prize,” a tweet reads commenting on his win. “Yeah that’s pretty f*cking sh*tty.”

As a reply, another Twitter user wrote something I agree with to a great extent:

“We’re watching the death of artistry unfold right before our eyes — if creative jobs aren’t safe from machines, then even high-skilled jobs are in danger of becoming obsolete

What will we have then?”

And yes, we can certainly discuss what the growth of AI means for the creative industry. The world is changing, technology is becoming wildly advanced, and text-to-image generators could become a serious threat to creativity. However, I’d like to discuss something else today. Was it really that simple to create and submit this AI-generated artwork Allen?

The process of creating the artwork

As I already mentioned, Allen used Midjourney to create the image that won him first place. But what does the process look like when you create an AI-generated art to enter a contest? As Allen explained himself, he used a “special prompt” and created hundreds of images using it. He then spent several weeks fine-tuning and curating the generated images until he was able to choose the top three. After upscaling them using Gigapixel AI, he entered the Colorado State Fair’s contest… And won in the digital arts category.

It’s true that no artistic skill was needed to create this work, so I totally understand why artists are pissed. But it did require quite a lot of time and effort and it wasn’t as simple as it sounds at first. After all, I think it also required Allen to have some artistic knowledge or talent to curate the images and choose which ones to submit for the contest.

Where do we go from here?

In my opinion, we can look at Allen’s first prize as an experiment. It shows us just how much (and how quickly) the world of art is changing. It suggests that we should make place for new technologies and perhaps rethink and reorganize art contests.

In the near future, I believe we will, and should, see contests for AI-generated images specifically. It could be fun to see what prompts people come up with and how they curate the results to choose the best ones. However, this requires a whole different set of skills than photography, painting, or human-generated digital art. This is why I believe that humans and AI shouldn’t compete in the same category… Or even the same contest.

[via VICE]

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 responses to “Death of creativity: AI-generated image wins a fine arts competition”

  1. Daniel D. Teoli Jr Avatar
    Daniel D. Teoli Jr

    Digital art takes talent. I wish I could do it. But I’m talking about real art, not computer-generated art with little or no artist input.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/953b61adc73af38e36d717fc8584b84f03adfc603d10c35d36c08d6db8059940.jpg

  2. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    Is it going to disrupt art? Almost definitely. Is it the death of creativity? Absolutely not, it’s just another evolution of the medium.

  3. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    the craft becomes code now

  4. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    It was once said that anyone using a camera obscura was a cheat. Some say use of a ruler is cheating or lacking in craft… Some say anyone not making their own paints isn’t really an artist… Others go further by saying a true artist hunts for and mines their own pigments…

    The question is, was one who TRULY THINKS behind that which was created?… AI, as is, doesn’t necessarily “think” but process information based upon a set of instructions it has been provided (some say that’s what people do)… Sooo… is the A.I. responsible for the “art” or the one(s) who created it?

  5. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    A.I = The microwave of the art world

  6. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    Ethical discussions need to be brought up…

  7. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    Gotta love how they leave the most important detail from the article out of the headline. The person won in the DIGITAL ART category

  8. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    I’m not in agreement with this. 😢

  9. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    Not sure what the problem is. The category in which he won was Digital Art. Does it get more digital than this?

  10. DIYP community member Avatar
    DIYP community member

    OK, these one very mediocre, but if you work hard enough with AI, there are several possibilities to be creative. Very creative. Simply use different rules for this new art. Like you play piano. You should know a lot before you make music.